Header
about | contact | sitemap | home
Mesothelioma

What is Mesothelioma

Pleural Mesothelioma

Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Pericardial Mesothelioma

Risk Factors

Symptoms

Stages

Asbestosis

Mesothelioma Treatment

Treatment Options

Treatment by stages

Chemotherapy

Medical Procedures

Imaging Scans

Types of Doctors

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials Directory

Cancer Care Centers

Mesothelioma Specialists

Alternative Therapies

Asbestos

Types of Asbestos

Asbestos Industry

Asbestos History

In the Workplace

Asbestos Legislation

Asbestos Removal

Legal Help

Your Legal Rights

Choosing an Attorney

The Legal Process

Evaluating Your Case

Court Upholds Asbestos Award

An appeals court in San Francisco made the decision to uphold an $11 million award to an area couple who sued when the husband developed asbestosis after working in several Navy shipyards during the 1940s and 1950s.

According to a report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Joseph and Mary Garza, who now live in Colorado, filed the suit against Asbestos Corp. Ltd. in 2005 after Joseph Garza was diagnosed with the disease. During the trial, 77-year-old Garza testified that he has difficulty breathing and walking any distance and has lost the ability to care for his wife, who is ridden with health problems.

The article points out that Garza joined the Navy at age 17 and worked at Hunters Point in San Francisco as well as various other shipyards. Testimony showed that he was responsible for using asbestos products to repair boilers but was not issued protective gear to use while working.

“He was also exposed to asbestos insulation in later jobs, but a San Francisco jury assigned 75 percent of the responsibility for his illness to Asbestos Corp., which made the sealant used by the Navy,” the court said.

The July 2006 verdict included $1.1 million to Joseph Garza for medical costs and emotional distress, $400,000 to Mary Garza for loss of her husband’s care and attention, and $10 million in punitive damages against Asbestos Corp. The appeals court agreed with the verdict, saying that the company had behaved “reprehensibly.”

Citing testimony that Asbestos Corp. had been aware of the dangers of asbestos since the 1940s but sold it without warning labels until 1970, the three-judge panel said the company “intentionally marketed a defective product knowing that it might cause injury and death.”

Free Mesothelioma Information Pack

Mesothelioma Packet Enter your information to receive a free mesothelioma information packet in 24 hours.

First Name:

Last Name:

Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Telephone:

Email Address:

Is it possible you
or someone you
know has
mesothelioma?
Yes   No

frequently asked questions
glossary
job sites

Shipyards

Metal Works

Powerhouses

Other Job Sites

mesothelioma

Current News

Archived News

Critics Say Canada Ignoring Asbestos Victims

A recent propane explosion in Toronto that scattered asb ...

Asbestos Threat Continues After Toronto Blast

Tempers continue to flare as residents in the vicinity of Sunday’s blast a ...

OSHA Cites Cincinnati Facility for Asbestos Violations

Cast-Fab Technologies Inc. of Cinci ...

Secretary at Iron Company Develops Mesothelioma

Group Offers Asbestos Removal Kit

Labor Union Searching for Former Shipyard Workers

Support

Coping Process

Managing Pain

Nutrition

For the Caregiver

Feelings After Diagnosis

Dealing with Symptoms

Practical Issues

Relationship Issues

Wills and DNRs

Resources